Back to comparisons

Comparison

Omega-3 (DHA/EPA) vs Pycnogenol (Maritime Pine Bark)

FieldOmega-3 (DHA/EPA)Pycnogenol (Maritime Pine Bark)
Categoryneuroprotectiveneuroprotective
Dose range1000–3000mg100–200mg
Half-life24h
Onset
EvidenceEVIDENCEAEVIDENCEB
Safety●●●●●●●●●●
Legal (US)USOTCUSOTC
PubMed refs5200580

The comparison in plain English

Auto-generated from data

Omega-3 (DHA/EPA) and Pycnogenol (Maritime Pine Bark) are both in the neuroprotective category respectively. Omega-3 (DHA/EPA) Essential fatty acids critical for brain structure and function. Pycnogenol (Maritime Pine Bark) Branded extract of French maritime pine bark.

Bottom line

Omega-3 (DHA/EPA) (evidence A, safety 5/5) has a weaker evidence base than Pycnogenol (Maritime Pine Bark) (evidence B, safety 5/5). Omega-3 (DHA/EPA) has the slightly cleaner safety profile. For users new to either, the higher-evidence option is the safer first try.

Choose Omega-3 (DHA/EPA) if

Omega-3 (DHA/EPA) is the better fit when your goal aligns with its mechanism (DHA (docosahexaenoic acid) is a structural component of neuronal cell membranes, maintaining fluidity and supporting receptor function) and the dose range (1000–3000mg) suits your protocol. Half-life is 24h.

Choose Pycnogenol (Maritime Pine Bark) if

Pycnogenol (Maritime Pine Bark) is the better fit when your goal aligns with its mechanism (A complex of procyanidins (oligomeric proanthocyanidins), bioflavonoids, and organic acids) and the dose range (100–200mg) suits your protocol. Half-life is —h.

Build a stack with bothOpen builder →
Check interactionsOpen checker →