Back to comparisons

Comparison

Magnesium L-Threonate vs Urolithin A (Mitopure)

FieldMagnesium L-ThreonateUrolithin A (Mitopure)
Categoryneuroprotectiveneuroprotective
Dose range1000–2000mg500–1000mg
Half-life6h
Onset
EvidenceEVIDENCEBEVIDENCEB
Safety●●●●●●●●●●
Legal (US)USOTCUSOTC
PubMed refs90280

The comparison in plain English

Auto-generated from data

Magnesium L-Threonate and Urolithin A (Mitopure) are both in the neuroprotective category respectively. Magnesium L-Threonate MIT-developed magnesium that crosses the blood-brain barrier. Urolithin A (Mitopure) Bioactive metabolite of pomegranate ellagitannins.

Bottom line

Magnesium L-Threonate (evidence B, safety 5/5) matches the evidence base of Urolithin A (Mitopure) (evidence B, safety 5/5). Magnesium L-Threonate has the slightly cleaner safety profile. For users new to either, the higher-evidence option is the safer first try.

Choose Magnesium L-Threonate if

Magnesium L-Threonate is the better fit when your goal aligns with its mechanism (L-threonate is a sugar-acid carrier that uniquely enables magnesium to cross the blood-brain barrier in meaningful quantities — most oral magnesium forms (oxide, citrate, glycinate) raise serum magnesium but not central magnesium) and the dose range (1000–2000mg) suits your protocol. Half-life is 6h.

Choose Urolithin A (Mitopure) if

Urolithin A (Mitopure) is the better fit when your goal aligns with its mechanism (Selectively activates mitophagy — the autophagy of damaged mitochondria — through PINK1/Parkin signaling) and the dose range (500–1000mg) suits your protocol. Half-life is —h.

Build a stack with bothOpen builder →
Check interactionsOpen checker →