Back to comparisons

Comparison

Magnesium L-Threonate vs PQQ

FieldMagnesium L-ThreonatePQQ
Categoryneuroprotectiveneuroprotective
Dose range1000–2000mg10–40mg
Half-life6h
Onset
EvidenceEVIDENCEBEVIDENCEC
Safety●●●●●●●●●●
Legal (US)USOTCUSOTC
PubMed refs90320

The comparison in plain English

Auto-generated from data

Magnesium L-Threonate and PQQ are both in the neuroprotective category respectively. Magnesium L-Threonate MIT-developed magnesium that crosses the blood-brain barrier. PQQ Pyrroloquinoline quinone — cofactor in mitochondrial biogenesis.

Bottom line

Magnesium L-Threonate (evidence B, safety 5/5) has a weaker evidence base than PQQ (evidence C, safety 5/5). Magnesium L-Threonate has the slightly cleaner safety profile. For users new to either, the higher-evidence option is the safer first try.

Choose Magnesium L-Threonate if

Magnesium L-Threonate is the better fit when your goal aligns with its mechanism (L-threonate is a sugar-acid carrier that uniquely enables magnesium to cross the blood-brain barrier in meaningful quantities — most oral magnesium forms (oxide, citrate, glycinate) raise serum magnesium but not central magnesium) and the dose range (1000–2000mg) suits your protocol. Half-life is 6h.

Choose PQQ if

PQQ is the better fit when your goal aligns with its mechanism (Pyrroloquinoline quinone uniquely stimulates mitochondrial biogenesis via the PGC-1α pathway — it doesn't just improve existing mitochondrial function but creates new mitochondria) and the dose range (10–40mg) suits your protocol. Half-life is —h.

Build a stack with bothOpen builder →
Check interactionsOpen checker →