Back to comparisons

Comparison

Magnesium L-Threonate vs Nicotinamide Riboside (NR)

FieldMagnesium L-ThreonateNicotinamide Riboside (NR)
Categoryneuroprotectiveneuroprotective
Dose range1000–2000mg250–1000mg
Half-life6h
Onset
EvidenceEVIDENCEBEVIDENCEA
Safety●●●●●●●●●●
Legal (US)USOTCUSOTC
PubMed refs90250

The comparison in plain English

Auto-generated from data

Magnesium L-Threonate and Nicotinamide Riboside (NR) are both in the neuroprotective category respectively. Magnesium L-Threonate MIT-developed magnesium that crosses the blood-brain barrier. Nicotinamide Riboside (NR) NAD+ precursor — the most-studied form for direct NAD+ elevation in humans.

Bottom line

Magnesium L-Threonate (evidence B, safety 5/5) has a stronger evidence base than Nicotinamide Riboside (NR) (evidence A, safety 5/5). Magnesium L-Threonate has the slightly cleaner safety profile. For users new to either, the higher-evidence option is the safer first try.

Choose Magnesium L-Threonate if

Magnesium L-Threonate is the better fit when your goal aligns with its mechanism (L-threonate is a sugar-acid carrier that uniquely enables magnesium to cross the blood-brain barrier in meaningful quantities — most oral magnesium forms (oxide, citrate, glycinate) raise serum magnesium but not central magnesium) and the dose range (1000–2000mg) suits your protocol. Half-life is 6h.

Choose Nicotinamide Riboside (NR) if

Nicotinamide Riboside (NR) is the better fit when your goal aligns with its mechanism (Precursor in the NAD+ salvage pathway via NRK1 and NRK2 enzymes that phosphorylate NR to NMN, which then converts to NAD+) and the dose range (250–1000mg) suits your protocol. Half-life is —h.

Build a stack with bothOpen builder →
Check interactionsOpen checker →