Back to comparisons

Comparison

Noopept vs BPC-157

FieldNoopeptBPC-157
Categorypeptidepeptide
Dose range10–30mg0.2–0.5mg
Half-life0.5h
Onset20min
EvidenceEVIDENCEBEVIDENCEC
Safety●●●●●●○○○
Legal (US)USUnscheduledUSResearch chemical
PubMed refs90110

The comparison in plain English

Auto-generated from data

Noopept and BPC-157 are both in the peptide category respectively. Noopept Russian-developed proline-containing dipeptide ~1000x more potent than piracetam by weight. BPC-157 Pentadecapeptide from gastric juice.

Bottom line

Noopept (evidence B, safety 4/5) has a weaker evidence base than BPC-157 (evidence C, safety 2/5). Noopept has the slightly cleaner safety profile. For users new to either, the higher-evidence option is the safer first try.

Choose Noopept if

Noopept is the better fit when your goal aligns with its mechanism (Increases BDNF and NGF expression in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex) and the dose range (10–30mg) suits your protocol. Half-life is 0.5h.

Choose BPC-157 if

BPC-157 is the better fit when your goal aligns with its mechanism (Stimulates angiogenesis (new blood vessel formation) at injury sites, modulates nitric oxide and growth hormone receptor signalling, and increases collagen production in fibroblasts) and the dose range (0.2–0.5mg) suits your protocol. Half-life is —h.

Build a stack with bothOpen builder →
Check interactionsOpen checker →