Back to comparisons

Comparison

Magnesium L-Threonate vs EGCG (Green Tea)

FieldMagnesium L-ThreonateEGCG (Green Tea)
Categoryneuroprotectiveneuroprotective
Dose range1000–2000mg200–500mg
Half-life6h
Onset
EvidenceEVIDENCEBEVIDENCEA
Safety●●●●●●●●●
Legal (US)USOTCUSOTC
PubMed refs904800

The comparison in plain English

Auto-generated from data

Magnesium L-Threonate and EGCG (Green Tea) are both in the neuroprotective category respectively. Magnesium L-Threonate MIT-developed magnesium that crosses the blood-brain barrier. EGCG (Green Tea) Most abundant catechin in green tea.

Bottom line

Magnesium L-Threonate (evidence B, safety 5/5) has a stronger evidence base than EGCG (Green Tea) (evidence A, safety 4/5). Magnesium L-Threonate has the slightly cleaner safety profile. For users new to either, the higher-evidence option is the safer first try.

Choose Magnesium L-Threonate if

Magnesium L-Threonate is the better fit when your goal aligns with its mechanism (L-threonate is a sugar-acid carrier that uniquely enables magnesium to cross the blood-brain barrier in meaningful quantities — most oral magnesium forms (oxide, citrate, glycinate) raise serum magnesium but not central magnesium) and the dose range (1000–2000mg) suits your protocol. Half-life is 6h.

Choose EGCG (Green Tea) if

EGCG (Green Tea) is the better fit when your goal aligns with its mechanism (Powerful antioxidant — one of the most reactive natural radical scavengers known) and the dose range (200–500mg) suits your protocol. Half-life is —h.

Build a stack with bothOpen builder →
Check interactionsOpen checker →