Back to comparisons

Comparison

Creatine vs Glycine

FieldCreatineGlycine
Categoryamino-acidamino-acid
Dose range3000–5000mg3000–5000mg
Half-life3h1h
Onset
EvidenceEVIDENCEAEVIDENCEB
Safety●●●●●●●●●●
Legal (US)USOTCUSOTC
PubMed refs1800980

The comparison in plain English

Auto-generated from data

Creatine and Glycine are both in the amino-acid category respectively. Creatine The most-studied performance supplement in history, now well-evidenced as a cognitive enhancer in its own right. Glycine Smallest amino acid, inhibitory neurotransmitter and sleep enhancer.

Bottom line

Creatine (evidence A, safety 5/5) has a weaker evidence base than Glycine (evidence B, safety 5/5). Creatine has the slightly cleaner safety profile. For users new to either, the higher-evidence option is the safer first try.

Choose Creatine if

Creatine is the better fit when your goal aligns with its mechanism (Phosphorylated by creatine kinase to phosphocreatine, the fastest available ATP buffer in the cell (millisecond timescale)) and the dose range (3000–5000mg) suits your protocol. Half-life is 3h.

Choose Glycine if

Glycine is the better fit when your goal aligns with its mechanism (The simplest amino acid and a direct inhibitory neurotransmitter at glycine receptors concentrated in the brainstem and spinal cord) and the dose range (3000–5000mg) suits your protocol. Half-life is 1h.

Build a stack with bothOpen builder →
Check interactionsOpen checker →